Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Annie Hind's avatar

Often people (especially women) create using textiles as a means of escaping their troubles, not magnifying them. Why absolutely everything has to be politicised all the time I have no idea. It's a very puritan way of looking at life - all you do should have a serious meaning. Well, no - sometimes I do stuff because I like doing it and because the results give me pleasure. Call me frivolous......

I read some of the reviews for the exhibition and while I do think public art (exhibitions) should be thought provoking, the descriptions, 'powerful', 'visceral' 'filled with horror'.......? Nope, thank you. Just as well we live in the wild and woolly north so the option of a quick trip to the Barbican isn't on the cards. Time Out's review went against the tide though!

Expand full comment
Sarah Morpeth's avatar

Oh I so agreed with this; I would add too that there’s also a sense of what is worthy and important having to involve pain and angst in the very making of it - that if the process is enjoyable then it’s somehow less valuable. I remember hearing Howard Hodgkin interviewed and him saying what agony painting was for him (and thus very important and meaningful). I just thought - you are in the wrong job mate ! When I felt like that I realised it was time to change careers ! I’ve always felt textiles were treated as lesser partly because of this perception that making art can’t be fun and enjoyable, and if it is fun then it’s not Art. Thanks for an excellent read !

Expand full comment
35 more comments...

No posts